• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
grubsheet

grubsheet

#21 THE OLLEY AND THE ARCHIES

Posted on April 16, 2011 4 Comments

Olley
Margaret Olley: Archibald Winner 2011

Controversy invariably dogs Australia’s most celebrated art award – The Archibald Prize for portraiture – and fortunately for those of us who love a good artistic stoush, this year is no exception. As the hordes descend on the Art Gallery of New South Wales this weekend for the usually suffocating launch of the Archibald Exhibition, all eyes will be on the winner – Ben Quilty’s portrait of Margaret Olley, the much-loved first lady and patron saint of Australian art. Is it fair dinkum, a genuine painting from real life, as the Archibald rules prescribe? Or is Quilty guilty of resorting to photographs in what’s supposed to be a purist expression of a painter’s talent? The critics are taking up their corners and the seconds are out of the ring.

The Sydney Morning Herald’s John MacDonald was effusive about the picture, opining that it “ticked so many boxes the judges would have had difficulty explaining how they could ever have given the prize to anything else”. Quilty, he said, had “painted a truthful likeness without dwelling too painfully on signs of age”. Olley turns 88 in June. The Archibald win, MacDonald wrote, had “confirmed Ben Quilty’s status as one of Australia’s most dynamic young artists”.

Christopher Allan
Christopher Allan
But in The Australian, Christopher Allen slammed the work as “ a very bad one on several scores”. First, he said, it was “grotesquely oversized”. “What reason can there be for painting the face of a tiny, elderly woman in this scale? Instead of intimacy and insight, we are faced with a massive surface that is at once emphatic and blank”, Allen wrote. But what’s created a minor storm is Christopher Allen’s contention that the Quilty portrait “looks like the extravagantly camouflaged transcription of a photo”. “Quilty claims that he used etching and drawing, as well as photographs, in making this picture. I can believe this, because many painters can’t actually obtain a likeness from copying a photograph, or even get the shape of the face right”, Allen wrote.

Ben Quilty
Ben Quilty by Cherry Hood

This is a rapier at the heart of the Archibalds. Isn’t obtaining a likeness of the subject the whole point of portraiture? Why give the prize to an artist who can’t do so without photography? The withering glance of the Sydney glitterati will doubtless descend on Allen for the grenade he’s thrown, let alone for his own withering assessment of Ben Quilty’s talent as an artist. “Quilty has ability, but he should renounce gimmicks and the pull-apart pictures for which he is known and try painting instead”, Allen wrote. Ouch.

Ray
"Ray in Paris"

Grubsheet would relish being the meat in the sandwich between John MacDonald and Christopher Allen at one of the fabled lunches regularly thrown by art dealer, Ray Hughes, an Archibald subject himself this year. We don’t know Allen but have had many alcohol-fuelled encounters with MacDonald at the Hughes salon. He’s no wilting violet and his response to the criticism of Quilty is likely to be characteristically colourful and curt.

A clearly bristling Ben Quilty has come to his own defence by issuing a challenge “to give anyone a draw-off to show that I can draw”. Quilty accepted that he’d used photographic references in executing the work. “Sure, I took photographs, but I made steel-plate etchings as well, and I did drawings. I used a lot of things”, he said.

Incidentally, Grubsheet thought Lucy Culliton’s entry – Ray in Paris – was particularly good and perfectly captured our old mate’s legendary bonhomie, irascibility and eye for a good tie. No need for photographs here. Ray is Lucy’s dealer, patron and friend and the picture is from real life during a rambunctious European sojourn last year.

Olley
Margaret Olley: Archibald winner 1948

Whatever the controversy about Ben Quilty’s work, there’s no denying the continuing star power of his subject, who’s become the first person in the 90-year history of the Archibalds to be the subject of the winning entry twice. Margaret Olley was a comely 25 when she was painted by William Dobell for the competition in 1948. She tells the story that Dobell asked her to come to a party dressed as a duchess. This was no easy task in that era of post-war austerity so Olley cobbled together an extravagant dress made of pieces of parachute silk. The resulting image as become one of the icons of Australian art. And the lady herself has matured into not only one of our greatest painters herself but an extravagantly generous benefactor who’s given away an estimated eight-million dollars. Bravo.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. maddie says

    February 12, 2012 at 1:20 pm

    The portrait of Ray Hughes doesn’t show how wretchedly obese he is and what a strange voice he has

    Reply
  2. Olivia says

    September 5, 2013 at 4:15 am

    “No need for photographs here. Ray is Lucy’s dealer, patron and friend and the picture is from real life during a rambunctious European sojourn last year. …” I reckon Lucy has made this picture from a photograph, or maybea few, from real life. she isabeautiful painter in my eyes but I haveno doubts heresies heavily on photographs and her previous career As a graphic designer to construct her delicious works, anyway that’s what I reckon, she leavesamuchmoreinteresting trail to her ‘shot’ than quilty in my opinion. I’m embarking on painting on a daily basis and I have a projector and I really feel like a criminal with it sometimes, it’s just such a shortcut, there’s something so dishonest about the art I make from a photo than one from life, anyway, I’m buying some fucking water colours tomorrow and Ill see how far I can get with truth hand and eye.

    Reply
    • Chand says

      September 10, 2013 at 2:40 pm

      wtf you doing @ 4am with this piece of shit

      Reply
  3. Olivia says

    September 5, 2013 at 4:18 am

    in regards to above comment, how would a painting portray what a strange fucking voice anyone had… apologies for language and space bar isntworkingso well.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

Primary Sidebar

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Get Posts via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to Grubsheet and receive notifications of new posts by email.

About Grubsheet

Graham Davis
Grubsheet Feejee is the blogsite of Graham Davis, an award-winning journalist turned communications consultant who was the Fijian Government’s principal communications advisor for six years from 2012 to 2018 and continued to work on Fiji’s global climate and oceans campaign up until the end of the decade.

 

Fiji-born to missionary parents and a dual Fijian-Australian national, Graham spent four decades in the international media before returning to Fiji to work full time in 2012. He reported from many parts of the world for the BBC, ABC, SBS, the Nine and Seven Networks and Sky News and wrote for a range of newspapers and magazines in Australia, New Zealand and Fiji.

 

Graham launched Grubsheet Feejee in 2011 and suspended writing for it after the Fijian election of 2014, by which time he was working at the heart of government. But the website continued to attract hits as a background resource on events in Fiji in the transition back to parliamentary democracy.

 

Grubsheet relaunches in 2020 at one of the most critical times in Fijian history, with the nation reeling from the Covid-19 crisis and Frank Bainimarama’s government shouldering the twin burdens of incumbency and economic disintegration.

 

Grubsheet’s sole agenda is the national interest; the strengthening of Fiji’s ties with the democracies; upholding equal rights for all citizens; government that is genuinely transparent and free of corruption and nepotism; and upholding Fiji’s service to the world in climate and oceans advocacy and UN Peacekeeping.

 

Comments are welcome and you can contact me in the strictest confidence at grubsheetcontact@gmail.com

 

(Feejee is the original name for Fiji - a derivative of the indigenous Viti and the Tongan Fisi - and was widely used until the late 19th century)

Copyright © 2022 Grubsheet - All Rights Reserved - For permission to republish any content or images from this blog please contact the author directly.